You generated a track in two minutes with an AI, it fits your video perfectly, and one question shows up right after the excitement wears off: are you allowed to publish it? To monetize it? Could someone come after you later?
The phrase "royalty-free music" gets thrown around everywhere and ends up meaning everything and its opposite. It almost never refers to music without an owner. It refers to a contract: the one you agree to when you tick the terms of use of a generator, usually without reading them.
Here is a plain-language look at what French law says about AI-generated works, what music generator licenses actually cover, the three ways to get tracks you can use commercially, and the checklist to run through before every publication. No unexplained jargon, concrete examples, and official sources so you can check for yourself.
What "royalty-free" really means
"Royalty-free" does not mean "no copyright": it means you pay once (or through a subscription) to use a track, without paying a royalty every time it's played.
A royalty is a fee: the amount paid to the rights holder for every radio play, every view, every use. Royalty-free music spares you that calculation, but it very much has an owner, a license, and limits spelled out in black and white.
| Status | What it means | What you can do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Royalty-free | One-time payment or subscription, no per-play fee | Use it according to the license, often with no view cap |
| Public domain | Economic rights have expired (70 years after the author's death in France) | Anything, including commercial use |
| Creative Commons BY | Free to use as long as you credit the author | Publish with precise attribution |
| Creative Commons BY-NC | Non-commercial use only | Personal projects, but no ads and no monetization |
| Publisher license (music libraries) | Usage rights tied to your active subscription | Publish according to the takedown rules in the contract |
The most common trap fits in one sentence: free does not mean commercial. Plenty of music generators offer a free plan whose tracks come out under a non-commercial license. You can listen to them, share them with friends, post them on a personal, non-monetized account. The moment the video becomes an ad, a paid course, or a monetized channel, you're outside the lines.
Who owns AI-generated music?
Under French law, music produced entirely by an AI is in principle not protected by any copyright, because there is no human author behind it.
The French Intellectual Property Code protects "works of the mind", and case law adds one condition: originality, meaning the imprint of the author's personality. A twelve-word prompt typed into an interface generally isn't enough to establish that imprint. France's Higher Council for Literary and Artistic Property, which advises the Ministry of Culture, follows the same logic: the more identifiable and documented the human input, the more plausible protection becomes.
Three very concrete consequences for you:
- You can exploit your track if the tool's license allows it, but you may not be able to stop another creator from reusing it if they come across it.
- What you actually hold is a contractual right of use, granted by the generator. That is not ownership of the work in the copyright sense, and the distinction changes everything in a dispute.
- Your human contribution does count. Lyrics you wrote, a bass line you played, a vocal you re-recorded, a mix you worked on: those elements can be protected in their own right, even if the base was generated.
One last point worth keeping in mind: the fact that a track was generated doesn't immunize you against infringement. If you explicitly ask for something "in the style of" a well-known artist and the result reproduces a recognizable melody, the rights holder of the original melody still has grounds to act. An artist's name and likeness are also protected independently of the music.
Three ways to get royalty-free AI music
The real difference between these three approaches isn't sound quality, it's how clear the license is and how many subscriptions you have to manage and keep an eye on.
Method 1: produce in an environment where the license is framed and explained
Skilzy is a French e-learning platform that combines two things rarely found together: programs to learn with (more than 15, from image creation to UGC video, plus automation with n8n and prompt writing) and a built-in AI Lab where you use the real tools, credits included.
The benefit for music is direct. Instead of taking out three subscriptions to compare three generators, then discovering three different licensing policies, you produce your tracks from a single place. The Compose an AI Hit program covers the technical side (structuring a music prompt, choosing a style, editing, exporting) and the awkward side: which license applies to what you just produced, what you're allowed to do with it, and what you need to document before publishing.
On pricing, access starts at €29.90 per month, no commitment. Two certifications registered in France Compétences' Répertoire spécifique are available and eligible for funding: RS7439 on AI-assisted content marketing, and RS6792 on AI applied to sales.
To try before paying, the discovery demo gives you 7 days with no credit card, including 1 image, 1 video, 1 music track, and 10 messages. It's not much, but it's enough to generate a first complete track and see whether the result matches what you had in mind.
Method 2: dedicated music generators
Suno, Udio, Riffusion, Mubert: these are the specialized tools, and they do the job very well. The thing to watch is always the same, the dividing line between the free plan and the paid plan.
On most of these services, tracks generated on the free tier come out under a non-commercial license, and only paid subscriptions unlock commercial use. Two questions to ask yourself every time before committing: does the commercial permission cover tracks created before you subscribed, and what happens to it if you cancel in six months? Some licenses stay in force for titles produced during the subscription period, others don't. It's written down, you just have to go read it.
If you're torn between several tools, the comparison of the best AI music generators breaks down the output and the plans for each one, and the guide to generating music with AI as a beginner covers the basics of writing a music prompt.
Method 3: traditional royalty-free music libraries
These aren't AI, but they answer the same need and deserve a mention. YouTube's Audio Library and Pixabay Music offer free tracks, with attribution requirements that vary from track to track. Subscription services like Epidemic Sound, Artlist, or Uppbeat charge between €10 and €25 per month and offer an advantage AI can't provide yet: a license that has been in place for years, tested in court, and a fast release procedure when an automated claim hits on YouTube.
| Method | Indicative cost | Commercial use | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skilzy AI Lab | From €29.90/month | Framed and explained in the program | Beginners who want to learn while producing |
| Dedicated generator | €8 to €30/month depending on the plan | Paid plans only in most cases | Creators already comfortable with a specific tool |
| Traditional music library | €0 to €25/month | Covered by contract, very clearly defined | Client projects with zero risk tolerance |
The checklist to run before every publication
Five checks are enough, and they take less than five minutes once you know where to look.
- Which plan was the track generated on? Free or paid, the answer determines everything else. Note the generation date.
- Is commercial use explicitly allowed? Look for the words "commercial use" in the terms. If they're not there, assume it isn't allowed.
- What happens if you cancel? Does the license survive the end of the subscription for tracks you've already produced?
- Is the license exclusive? In the vast majority of cases, no. Someone else can generate a very similar track, which matters if you're building a brand's sonic identity.
- Do you need to disclose that the content is AI-generated? The European AI Act has imposed transparency obligations on artificially generated content since August 2, 2026, and several streaming platforms have rolled out their own labeling.
Add one simple habit: keep a record. A dated screenshot of the terms of use page, your prompt, the export date, and the invoice number for your subscription are enough to answer in two minutes if an advertiser or a platform asks you to justify yourself. For what comes next, particularly declaring income and the rules specific to streaming platforms, the article on what's legal when you monetize AI music goes further.
Platforms apply their own rules, regardless of your license
Your license governs your relationship with the generator, not with YouTube, TikTok, Spotify, or performing rights organizations, which each have their own policy and apply it without asking your opinion.
On YouTube, Content ID automatically compares your soundtrack against a database of registered tracks. An AI-generated title can get claimed because it resembles a track recorded by a third party, or because another user registered a track made with the same tool. The dispute process exists, but it takes time and sometimes freezes monetization in the meantime.
On TikTok, the standard music library is reserved for personal accounts: as soon as you represent a brand, you have to draw from the commercial library or bring your own licensed music. Properly licensed AI music solves that problem, as long as you can prove it.
On the streaming side, the cleanup is underway. Spotify announced in September 2025 that it had removed 75 million tracks deemed undesirable over twelve months, and is working on labeling AI-generated content at the metadata level. Deezer said around the same time that roughly 28% of the tracks uploaded to its platform each day were entirely AI-generated. Publishing AI music is still possible, but publishing it at volume with no added value now leads to plain removal.
Finally, France's SACEM won't register a work without a declared human author. If you want to register a track, you need a real, demonstrable personal contribution: lyrics, composing a melody, performance. Generating and registering a title produced entirely by a machine exposes you to a false declaration.
Key takeaways
AI music isn't magically free: it's governed by a contract, the one from the tool you use. Check your plan, check for the commercial use clause, keep dated proof, and add a human contribution as soon as the project matters to you.
The rest you learn by doing. If you want to test music generation before picking a subscription, Skilzy's discovery demo gives you 7 days with no credit card, and a full track to produce from prompt to export.
