You generated a track in two minutes with an AI, it fits your video perfectly, and then a question shows up right after the excitement: are you allowed to publish it? To monetize it? Could someone come after you for it later?
The phrase "royalty-free music" gets thrown around so much that it ends up meaning everything and nothing. It almost never describes music without an owner. It describes a contract: the one you accept when you tick the terms of use of a generator, usually without reading them.
Here, in plain terms, is what French law says about AI-generated creations, what music generator licenses actually cover, the three ways to get tracks you can use commercially, and the checklist to run through before every publication. No unexplained jargon, concrete examples, and official sources so you can check things for yourself.
What "royalty-free" really means
"Royalty-free" does not mean "copyright-free": it means you pay once (or through a subscription) to use a track, without owing a fee every time it gets played.
A royalty is a usage fee: the amount paid to the rights holder for every radio play, every view, every use. Royalty-free music spares you that calculation, but it absolutely does have an owner, a license, and limits spelled out in black and white.
| Status | What it means | What you can do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Royalty-free | One-off payment or subscription, no per-play fee | Use it according to the license, often with no cap on views |
| Public domain | Economic rights have expired (70 years after the author's death in France) | Anything, including commercial use |
| Creative Commons BY | Free to use as long as you credit the author | Publish with precise credit |
| Creative Commons BY-NC | Non-commercial use only | Personal projects, but no ads and no monetization |
| Publisher license (music libraries) | Usage rights tied to your active subscription | Publish under the takedown rules set out in the contract |
The most common trap fits in a single sentence: free does not mean commercial. Plenty of music generators offer a free plan whose tracks come out under a non-commercial license. You can listen to them, share them with friends, post them on a personal account that isn't monetized. The moment the video becomes an ad, a paid course or a monetized channel, you're outside the lines.
Who owns AI-generated music?
Under French law, music produced entirely by an AI is in principle not protected by copyright at all, because there is no human author behind it.
The French Intellectual Property Code protects "works of the mind", and case law adds a condition: originality, meaning the imprint of the author's personality. A twelve-word prompt typed into an interface generally isn't enough to establish that imprint. France's Higher Council for Literary and Artistic Property (CSPLA), which advises the Ministry of Culture, follows the same logic: the more identifiable and documented the human contribution, the more plausible protection becomes.
Three very concrete consequences for you:
- You can exploit your track if the tool's license allows it, but you may not be able to stop another creator from reusing it if they stumble across it.
- What you actually hold is a contractual right of use, granted by the generator. It is not ownership of the work in the copyright sense, and that distinction changes everything in a dispute.
- Your human contribution does count. Lyrics you wrote, a bass line you played, a vocal you re-recorded, a mix you worked on: those elements can be protected in their own right, even if the base was generated.
One last point not to overlook: the fact that a track was generated doesn't make you immune to infringement claims. If you explicitly prompt "in the style of" a well-known artist and the result reproduces a recognizable melody, the owner of the original melody still has grounds to act. An artist's name and likeness are also protected separately from the music itself.
Three ways to get royalty-free AI music
The real difference between these three approaches isn't sound quality, it's how clear the license is and how many subscriptions you have to manage and keep an eye on.
Method 1: produce in an environment where the license is framed and explained
Skilzy is a French e-learning platform that combines two things rarely found together: programs to learn with (more than 15, from image creation to UGC video, plus automation with n8n and prompt writing) and a built-in AI Lab where you use the real tools, credits included.
The benefit for music is direct. Instead of taking out three subscriptions to compare three generators, then discovering three different licensing policies, you produce your tracks from a single place. The Compose an AI Hit program covers the technical side (how to structure a music prompt, choosing a style, tweaks, export) and the awkward side too: which license applies to what you just produced, what you're allowed to do with it, and what you need to document before publishing.
On pricing, access starts at €29.90 per month with no commitment. Two certifications registered in France Compétences' Répertoire spécifique are available and eligible for funding: RS7439 on AI-assisted content marketing, and RS6792 on AI applied to sales.
To try before paying, the discovery demo gives you 7 days with no credit card, including 1 image, 1 video, 1 music track and 10 messages. It isn't much, but it's enough to generate a first complete track and see whether the result matches what you had in mind.
Method 2: dedicated music generators
Suno, Udio, Riffusion, Mubert: these are the specialized tools, and they do the job very well. The thing to watch for is always the same, the dividing line between the free plan and the paid one.
On most of these services, tracks generated on a free plan come out under a non-commercial license, and only paid subscriptions unlock commercial use. Two questions to ask yourself every single time before committing: does the commercial permission cover tracks created before you subscribed, and what happens to it if you cancel in six months? Some licenses stay yours for tracks produced during the subscription period, others don't. It's written down, you just have to go and read it.
If you're torn between several tools, the comparison of the best AI music generators breaks down the output and the plans for each one, and the guide to generating music with AI as a beginner covers the basics of writing a music prompt.
Method 3: traditional royalty-free music libraries
These aren't AI, but they answer the same need and deserve a mention. The YouTube Audio Library and Pixabay Music offer free tracks, with attribution requirements that vary from track to track. Subscription services like Epidemic Sound, Artlist or Uppbeat charge between €10 and €25 per month and offer something AI can't give you yet: a license that's been written for years, tested in court, and a fast-track process for clearing automatic claims on YouTube.
| Method | Indicative cost | Commercial use | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skilzy AI Lab | From €29.90/month | Framed and explained inside the program | Beginners who want to learn while producing |
| Dedicated generator | €8 to €30/month depending on the plan | Restricted to paid plans in most cases | Creators already comfortable with one specific tool |
| Traditional music library | €0 to €25/month | Set out in the contract, very clearly mapped | Client projects with zero risk tolerance |
The checklist to run before every publication
Five checks are enough, and they take less than five minutes once you know where to look.
- Which plan was the track generated on? Free or paid, the answer determines everything else. Note the generation date.
- Is commercial use explicitly authorized? Look for the words "commercial use" in the terms. If they aren't there, assume it isn't allowed.
- What happens if you cancel? Does the license survive the end of the subscription for tracks you've already produced?
- Is the license exclusive? In the vast majority of cases, no. Someone else can generate a very similar track, which matters if you're building a brand's sonic identity.
- Do you need to disclose that the content is AI-generated? The European Union's AI Act has imposed transparency obligations on artificially generated content since 2 August 2026, and several streaming platforms have rolled out their own labeling.
Add one simple habit: keep a record. A dated screenshot of the terms of use page, your prompt, the export date and your subscription invoice number are enough to answer in two minutes if an advertiser or a platform asks you to account for it. To go further, particularly on declaring income and the rules specific to streaming platforms, the article on what's legal when you monetize AI music digs deeper.
Platforms apply their own rules, regardless of your license
Your license governs your relationship with the generator, not with YouTube, TikTok, Spotify or SACEM, each of which has its own policy and applies it without asking your opinion.
On YouTube, the Content ID system automatically compares your soundtrack against a database of registered tracks. An AI-generated title can get claimed because it resembles a track recorded by a third party, or because another user registered a track made with the same tool. There is a dispute process, but it takes time and sometimes freezes monetization in the meantime.
On TikTok, the standard music library is reserved for personal accounts: the moment you represent a brand, you have to draw from the commercial library or bring your own licensed music. Properly licensed AI music solves that problem, provided you can prove it.
Over on the streaming side, the cleanup is underway. Spotify announced in September 2025 that it had removed 75 million tracks it considered undesirable over twelve months, and it's working on labeling AI-generated content at the metadata level. Deezer said around the same time that roughly 28% of the tracks uploaded to its platform each day were entirely AI-generated. Publishing AI music is still possible, but publishing it en masse with no added value now leads to straightforward removal.
Finally, SACEM won't register a work without a declared human author. If you want to register a track, you need a real, demonstrable personal contribution: lyrics, composing a melody, performance. Generating and registering a track produced entirely by a machine exposes you to a false declaration.
The key takeaways
AI music isn't magically free: it's governed by a contract, the one belonging to the tool you use. Check your plan, check for the commercial use clause, keep dated proof, and add a human contribution as soon as the project genuinely matters to you.
The rest you learn by doing. If you want to try music generation before picking a subscription, Skilzy's discovery demo gives you 7 days with no credit card, and a full track to produce from prompt to export.
